by Fernanda Curti
4 minutes • AML • Last Updated October 23, 2025
The Case of 3 Mexican Financial Institutions: A Lesson in AML Vigilance
Following best anti-money laundering (AML) practices is essential in an interconnected world. A trio of Mexican banks offers a cautionary lesson for other banks worldwide: AML prevention is always better than fixing it later.
Key Findings
- The US government recently sanctioned three Mexican banks under the FEND Off Fentanyl Act.
- The sanctions have created a financial crisis in Mexico, but also signaled a message: AML isn’t just a compliance checklist. It’s a national security priority.
- The AML transaction monitoring technology market is expected to reach $6.8 billion by 2028, meaning implementing CDD and AML measures has never been more urgent.1
- Regulators expect continuous data monitoring, proactive disclosure, and automation for true oversight, not just documentation.
Why the US Government Sanctioned 3 Mexican Banks
In June 2025, the US Department of the Treasury issued historic orders against three Mexican financial institutions, accusing them of facilitating money laundering related to fentanyl trafficking. This action marked the first application of the FEND Off Fentanyl Act, which grants the US Treasury expanded powers to combat the financing of synthetic opioid trafficking.
The sanctions were motivated by concerns that these institutions lacked adequate AML controls to detect and prevent suspicious transactions related to drug cartels. The case demonstrated systemic failures in their Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and transaction monitoring processes.
AML Suite
AML programs require risk-based assessments across the entire customer lifecycle. But this is hard to do across siloed internal/external systems and data sources. Download our solution sheet to learn how Feedzai’s AML Suite delivers end-to-end protection against AML risks across the customer lifecycle.
The US sanctions have created a crisis in Mexico’s financial sector, as the affected institutions face severe restrictions on fund transfers with US entities. The situation generated market uncertainty and revealed how vulnerabilities in AML systems can have significant international consequences.
Mexico’s Roadmap to Stronger AML Compliance
Mexico’s financial sector is entering a decisive phase for AML compliance transformation. It’s essential that banks go beyond a check-the-box approach to compliance to a predictive, technology-driven defense. The path forward requires uniting strong governance, modern data intelligence, and cross-border collaboration to rebuild confidence, prevent sanctions, and future-proof institutional integrity.
AML has become a critical priority in the global financial system. With the AML transaction monitoring market projected to reach $6.8 billion by 2028, implementing effective Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and AML measures has never been more urgent.
Following these steps will be critical for Mexico’s banks and financial institutions worldwide.
Corrective and Preventive Actions
Here are some key steps Mexican banks can take:
1. Strengthening CDD Processes
Implementation of Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD):
- More rigorous verification of the origin of funds
- Detailed analysis of customers’ risk profiles
- Continuous monitoring of changes in transactional behavior
- Periodic reviews of high-risk relationships
Improvements in Information Gathering:
- More complete documentation of the purpose of accounts
- Independent verification of declared business activities
- Identification and verification of ultimate beneficial owners
- Analysis of complex corporate structures
2. Improving Monitoring Systems
Advanced Technology:
- Implementation of AI-based systems
- Real-time behavioral analysis
- Pattern detection using machine learning
- Integration of network and graph analysis to identify hidden connections
Alert Calibration:
- Reduction of false positives through improved predictive models
- Establishment of dynamic thresholds based on risk profiles
- Implementation of contextual analysis for more precise alerts
3. Systemic Integration
Coordination between Processes:
- Synchronization between KYC, CDD, and transaction monitoring
- Implementation of automatic screening against sanctions lists
- Creation of unified dashboards for risk visualization
- Establishment of automated workflows for investigations
4. Governance and Compliance
Control Structures:
- Establishment of independent AML committees
- Implementation of regular internal audits
- Creation of continuous training programs
- Development of clear escalation policies
Crucial Red Flags to Detect
AML readiness demands constant adaptation. Beyond adopting new technology, Mexican financial institutions must embed intelligence into decision-making across all levels:
Transactional Indicators:
- Structuring (Smurfing): Multiple transactions below reporting limits
- High-speed movement: Rapid transfers between jurisdictions
- Frequent round values: Consistent use of exact amounts
- Inconsistent volume: Activity that does not align with the customer’s profile
Geographic Indicators:
- Transactions involving high-risk jurisdictions
- Unexplained movement to countries with weak AML controls
- Use of offshore accounts without clear business justification
Behavioral Indicators:
- Resistance to providing documentation
- Sudden changes in transaction patterns
- Attempts to avoid verification procedures
- Relationships with complexly structured entities
Best Practices for Implementation
Regulators now expect continuous data monitoring, proactive disclosure, and automation that delivers true oversight, not just documentation. In Mexico and elsewhere, banks that thrive will be those transforming regulatory pressure into operational intelligence, embedding compliance into every transaction in real time.
1. Layered Approach
- Combination of rule-based and AI systems
- Multiple points of verification throughout the customer lifecycle
- Integration between different detection tools
2. Training and Culture
- Awareness programs for all employees
- Specialization of compliance teams
- Regular updates on new laundering techniques
3. Regulatory Cooperation
- Proactive communication with authorities
- Implementation of measures that exceed minimum requirements
- Participation in sectoral initiatives to combat financial crime
Conclusion
The case of the Mexican financial institutions serves as an alert about the severe consequences of inadequate AML systems. The robust implementation of CDD processes, combined with advanced monitoring technologies, is essential to protect financial institutions against regulatory and reputational risks.
Effective anti-money laundering requires a holistic approach integrating cutting-edge technology, rigorous processes, and a strong organizational culture. Only through this strategic combination can institutions maintain the financial system’s integrity and avoid the devastating consequences of compliance failures.
Resources
Footnotes
All expertise and insights are from human Feedzaians, but we may leverage AI to enhance phrasing or efficiency. Welcome to the future.